set the internet to: 1992 1997 1998 2001 2002 2003 2006 2007 2012 2017 2020 2022 2026
home
The Lost Art of Role-Playing
A 2006 forum role-play in which every turn tests the essay’s claim that shared imagination gains meaning through negotiation, delay, vulnerability, and surprise.
read the original
Two Imaginations
I begin with Dorothy and Jerome Singer’s distinction. A child playing alone arranges experience into story; two children playing roles must negotiate the story itself. In your thread, you want to charge a fort. Mara wants to set a trap. The scene cannot move until both writers make room for a plan neither fully controls.
- Ask what the trap needs
- Mara supplies rope and a false retreat. Your question gives her premise room, and the shared world gains details you would not have invented alone.
- Combine trap and charge
- You offer to draw the guards out while Mara sets the rope. Both intentions survive, creating a third plan through negotiation.
- Declare your charge succeeds
- The fort falls before Mara can act. The post advances quickly, but it removes her agency—the exact difficulty shared play is meant to preserve.
Another Cursor Enters
The screen falls back to the late 1970s. Roy Trubshaw and Richard Bartle’s MUD work at Essex turned text adventure into a place where another player could answer. MUDs, MUCKs, MOOs, and MUSHes then spread across the early internet, letting participants inhabit characters, build rooms, and form cultures together. The essential novelty is the second cursor.
- LOOK
- The terminal describes stone walls and an eastern door. The world becomes legible, but Mara remains only a name in the room list.
- SAY Who’s there?
- Mara answers in character and alters the scene. The command turns a database of rooms into a negotiated social world.
- BUILD a secret stair
- A new route appears for both players. Early MUD history records users adding rooms during play, sometimes changing the world beyond its designers’ intentions.
Fiction With Weight
A 1993 LambdaMOO abuse became a community crisis and a landmark essay by Julian Dibbell. I invoke it to show that text-based acts could wound real people and force shared decisions about moderation and punishment. The characters were invented; the participants’ vulnerability was not. A collaborative fiction therefore needed norms, consequences, and care.
- “It was only text”
- The reply dismisses the participant behind the character. my LambdaMOO example shows why communities found that boundary inadequate.
- Pause and set a boundary
- The thread stops the scene, restores Mara’s control, and asks the group to decide a rule. action produces real governance.
- Let Mara name the harm
- The affected writer defines what crossed the line before the group debates consequences. Shared authorship now includes shared responsibility.
Leave Room in the Post
By my childhood, role-play had moved into AOL chatrooms and forums. Literary partners wrote paragraphs in third person and sometimes waited days for an answer. The subculture’s rules protected reciprocity: do not assume a relationship, control someone else’s character, vanish without a word, or answer careful prose with a throwaway line. Mara has finally replied.
- Write Mara’s fear for her
- The prose is vivid, but it controls her interior life. The thread flags it as godmodding and returns that choice to Mara.
- Offer a sound and wait
- Your character hears boots below and reaches for the latch. Mara can decide what her character notices and does, preserving the opening.
- Ask out of character first
- A short note checks whether Mara wants the ambush to become romantic or remain tactical. Consent becomes part of the craft.
A Gift With a Delay
Bots can answer instantly, avoid social risk, and sometimes produce surprising prose. I have enjoyed that experience. My preference for humans rests elsewhere: another person notices trivial textures, withholds control, risks rejection, and writes for a vulnerable partner. Role-play taught me prose and perspective because the audience was also a collaborator who depended on me.
- Wait for Mara
- Her reply arrives tomorrow with the smell of bleach in the corridor and a changed plan. Delay brings another mind’s unexpected detail.
- Replace her with a bot
- The scene continues immediately and stays under your direction. You gain convenience while giving up the reciprocal obligation I treat as the source of growth.
- Send a gentle check-in
- Mara asks for another day. Caring for the writer alongside the character makes the exchange a relationship as well as a story.